Resolving the Mystery of Why We Like to Read Mysteries
And on the rare events when our deductive abilities actually help us to reach at the right answer the satisfaction is immense, we're super sleuths! Therefore what're a number of the standard components that make for a perfect whodunit? Firstly and really certainly, there's to be MURDER, at least one but preferably at least three. With regards to the storyline, these may be by the exact same strategy (as with a successive killer) or with totally different weapons and scenarios.
The latter is probably the more intriguing, because even though murderer may use various ways of killing, the type of offense ought to be the same (opportunist or well-planned, for instance) This should enable people to deduce the character fiction of the murderer (always recalling that he or she may well be masking their correct nature) and that information is a CLUE to the identity of the responsible party.
CLUES are an important element of a kill mystery. There are the physical hints - items found at the world of the offense, significant documents found in the victim's particular effects, dull shoe designs, lipstick remnants on a wine glass, a recently available cut on someone's arm - the record is endless. And there are the hints that may be picked up by the offense solver by, claim, hearing as to the the protagonist say.
Has that man contradicted a previous record? Did that girl lie about her connection with the lifeless man? All little pieces of the jigsaw; which when located together make the complete picture. Unless of course one or more of these is a RED HERRINGS. The RED HERRING is the best trick utilized by the authors of kill mysteries to get people seeking in every the wrong areas, and it frequently succeeds.
Usually, we know our error promptly, often since anyone that the red herring triggered us to imagine is knocked off; and therefore we change our attention to another SUSPECT. Possibly about half dozen SUSPECTS is the ideal quantity, all whom must at the start appear to have had the motive, suggests and possibility to make the crimes.
The latter is probably the more intriguing, because even though murderer may use various ways of killing, the type of offense ought to be the same (opportunist or well-planned, for instance) This should enable people to deduce the character fiction of the murderer (always recalling that he or she may well be masking their correct nature) and that information is a CLUE to the identity of the responsible party.
CLUES are an important element of a kill mystery. There are the physical hints - items found at the world of the offense, significant documents found in the victim's particular effects, dull shoe designs, lipstick remnants on a wine glass, a recently available cut on someone's arm - the record is endless. And there are the hints that may be picked up by the offense solver by, claim, hearing as to the the protagonist say.
Has that man contradicted a previous record? Did that girl lie about her connection with the lifeless man? All little pieces of the jigsaw; which when located together make the complete picture. Unless of course one or more of these is a RED HERRINGS. The RED HERRING is the best trick utilized by the authors of kill mysteries to get people seeking in every the wrong areas, and it frequently succeeds.
Usually, we know our error promptly, often since anyone that the red herring triggered us to imagine is knocked off; and therefore we change our attention to another SUSPECT. Possibly about half dozen SUSPECTS is the ideal quantity, all whom must at the start appear to have had the motive, suggests and possibility to make the crimes.
Comments
Post a Comment